Sunday, March 30, 2014

Top picking

There's no shortage of bearish calls out there. There's even comparisons of the market to 1929 based upon a chart overlay. That's a joke. Yes, there are some signs of froth namely the IPO market - the Candy Crush IPO seems ridiculous.  I read a report that said about 75% of announced IPOs in the US were money losing companies which is about the same percentage as early 2000 near the peak of the tech bubble. I suspect the social media and cloud computing space  is largely responsible for a lot of this froth. These types of studies are worrying people - even Cramer is concerned! However, there's no comparison between where are now vs early 2000.  Economically speaking, the US economy was running at full steam with record low unemployment in early 2000. The Fed was concerned about overheating and was tightening rates to the point where the yield curve was inverted;  a condition that always precedes a recession and major bear market. Optimism in general was palpable with consumer confidence at record highs. There was also this notion that we were in some sort of new economic paradigm thanks to the internet and the market as a whole was historically very overvalued on pretty much every metric you can think of. We are nowhere close to the conditions that existed in early 2000 or the start of other major bear markets. Monetary conditions are still very accommodating even with tapering. The economy is expanding but only modestly, unemployment is coming down but is still at unwanted levels and widespread optimism in general is non-existent - consumer confidence is still well below 100.

Another thing you will tend to see near the peak of a bull market is how most people embrace or find reasons to justify what appears to be froth as opposed to looking at any sign of optimism or froth as a contrarian reason to be worried as is the case today and in recent years as well. Take Cramer for example. In February 2000 he posted an infamous article about how you had to own  these 10 "new world "  names  (high flying  internet stocks) if you wanted to make money in the market. He was not alone. I remember how in 2000 practically every equity mutual fund in Canada had Nortel as a top holding. At its peak Nortel made up a ridiculous 1/3 of the TSX. You see, retail and many of the "pros" embraced the market and eschewed logic. They made justifications for the nose bleed valuations (the internet will spawn a new era of massive growth and so traditional valuation metrics are not applicable). Can you honestly say that this sort of sentiment prevails today? Hardly. This time around Cramer is siding with the bears pointing out the froth in the IPO market instead of embracing it  and other skeptics are not in short supply. Sure, there's more optimism out there vs a couple of years ago but that's only natural after a bull run like this. And let's face it, you, me and everyone else still has 2008 fresh in our mind and worry of a repeat anytime there's a problem. A lot of people out there are also still convinced that the this bull market is "artificial" in that it's all due to the fed.

So, the bottom line is that despite the signs of froth out there (specifically the IPO market),  there's no comparison to 2000 or 1929. The unwinding of this froth could lead to a correction but unlikely the death of the bull market. The fact that's there's so many top watchers still out there suggests to me that there's still a LT wall of worry out there. I think it's also indicative of sour grapes. A lot of pundits out there were reluctant to embrace the bull market and largely missed out on it and so now it seems they want to make up for it by nailing the top. Too fucking bad.

As I've been saying for some time, the correction when it comes will be elusive. Many people, including LT bulls like me, have been on guard for it for several months and all we've seen are rather minor dips. These kind of situations are rather frustrating but I still think the best course of action is maintain your positions in high conviction names and keep your standards higher than average when it comes to adding new longs while maintaining a healthy cash reserve. I'm not outright hedging with puts/shorts at this time, but you do whatever you gotta do.

3 comments:

  1. Hey nodice,

    Do you know why GRE has been trickling downwards as of late?

    ReplyDelete
  2. The selling pressure is largely due to one guy who uses Questrade which suggests a retail investor. He has a large position and has been dumping like a mad man since April began. Unless this guy knows something, there is no fundamental justification whatsoever for the stock to go down like this. The news they released Monday was quite bullish but this guy still kept on selling. He might be getting a margin call...seems almost like forced selling. Maybe he owned too many high flying tech stocks like TWTR which have been getting hammered...who knows. This kind of idiotic selling is the hazard of investing in thinly traded micro cap stocks. If someone who has a big position either needs the money, is forced to sell or gets spooked for some trivial reason, he can wreck havoc with the stock in the ST. I've been through this kind of situation more than a few times now over the past couple of years with hwo and gre. It's so frustrating. I fucking hate it and you can't help but have a little bit of fear in the back of your mind that maybe someone "knows something" but there's no way I will ever act on such fears. The only thing I will act on is the evidence in front of me and all of it suggests GRE is doing quite well and is worth a lot more than $0.91/sh

    ReplyDelete
  3. Another importing thing I should add is this. You have to keep in mind that there's a large Chinese shareholder base who have owned shares prior to when the company became public. These shareholders have a low cost basis and no doubt are in a position of profit even at this low valuation. So from their perspective, it's enticing for them to sell shares now that liquidity has improved significantly from 2 years ago. There's no of way knowing if and when they sell and when they do they probably don't care about fundamentals because they are still making a profit at these prices. These Chinese shareholders represent an overhang for the stock and I believe it explains why the stock price has been under pressure most of the time since last summer. There's no telling how long it will take the overhang to clear but when it does the fundamentals will assert themselves forcefully. I've seen this happen before with other stocks I've owned. In the meantime, it may require a great deal of patience and nerve to ride this out. The best thing to do IMO is to simply not pay attention to the day to day movements in the stock price (unless you want to buy more) and focus instead on the news releases and fundamentals. In the end, they are all the matter.

    ReplyDelete