Escalation

The Maduro capture turned out to be a non-event as far as market impact goes. My parents used to own a condo in Venezuela back in 90s in Margarita Island to which I have fond memories of. My initial reaction to Maduro's capture was one of positivity as this tyrant has clearly caused tremendous misery for its people. Although I knew the US didn't do this out of the kindness of their heart, I figured it was a good thing to see this guy go. But then I learned that the VP and its military/militia/police  who are loyal to her are left in charge continuing with the same oppressive regime while the US doesn't support the truly elected opposition leader. Given the ease to which the US was able to secure Maduro, I would not be surprised to learn that the VP had a hand in it with the understanding that she would be allowed to become in charge. Sadly, without a full scale change of the loyalty of the military/police away from dictatorship and towards a democratically elected government, Venezuelans will continue to live in misery. The level of corruption woven into the fabric of Venezuela's political and economic system may be too great to undo as is the case with similar basket case,  authoritarian regimes. You know I'm not a doomer, but I gotta tell it like I see it. Let's hope I'm proven wrong. 

I am all for the use of force by a foreign country to remove an oppressive dictator but it has to be done right. First of all, the argument of "don't meddle and just let the people overthrow the government" doesn't hold water in many cases because the people are often powerless and are effectively prisoners in situations where the military/police are loyal to the oppressive government.  And when in comes to authoritarian leaders, you have to fight force with force. Diplomacy does not work. If however, an oppressive government is removed by force,  there needs to be proper plan in place to ensure a successful democratic transition and that's clearly not easy.  It would require the use of the foreign country's resources including their own military and people for several years  It is also difficult to uproot enough of the corruption and those who are still loyal to the oppressive government who are lurking in the shadows just waiting for their moment to usurp.. It doesn't seem the US is not interested in making the type of  commitments needed to ensure Venezuela becomes a free and democratic country. As we all know, the US failed in their attempts to reform Iraq, Libya, and Afghanistan when they ousted their dictators 

Now there's talks again about Trump wanting Greenland. Throw Iran tensions in the mix and it would seem likely that Trump is not done meddling around. He  appears to be serious about acquiring/occupying Greenland. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent recently said Trump will not back down from acquiring Greenland, arguing Europe is too weak to ensure its own security. This reminds me of the tariff situation last year at this time. We all knew Trump wanted to implement significant tariffs but most of us thought this was largely a bluff and that he would settle for a lot less. Although that eventually ended up being the case, it sure wasn't initially when the "liberation day" plan was unveiled.  It would appear that this rising geopolitical tension is going to eventually hit the stock market given the market has a running of fumes feel to it.  As I've stated before, the longer we go without a sizeable 3-5% pullback, the greater the chance a larger 10% type pullback ends up occurring at this point. I can see that the futures are down 1% as the market is closed today. The recent comments from Trump and Bessent are giving me a clear sense of escalation and it looks like the markets may be feeling it too....we'll soon see.   

 

Quick follow up

The following chart pretty much captures why I have mixed feelings about 2026. It shows US financial conditions.  This indicator should be used as a contrarian indicator. As you can see, when conditions are very accommodative, i.e. above 1 for at least a few months, the markets were close to making a significant peak and conversely, when conditions were tight, i.e. below -1, the market was close to making a significant low. 

This is not a perfect indicator (no single indicator is).  It will not give advance warning to declines as a result of exogenous shocks like COVID and "Liberation day" because these are negative events that essentially came out of nowhere. It should also be noted that in 2014 when this indicator flashed red, the market still had a good year returning 14% with the largest correction being 8.5% . Then, in 2015 the SPX had a flat year with the largest correction being 12.5%. So, it would have been best to have ignored the warning in 2014. Currently, we are just below the 1 level after having touched it very briefly in October. This suggests the market is much closer to a top than a bottom but also that there's still room for the market to go higher  before reaching redline territory, although that shouldn't be taken as a given. This pretty much sums up my feelings of the market based upon my observations of several intermediate term sentiment indicators which is this: there is still room to run but we would be redlining should that happen without a correction of at least 5-10%. which would  then set us up for a even larger decline. 

News flash: The US has captured Maduro and made military strikes in Venezuela. Let's see how markets respond on Monday. 

Outlook 2026: I have mixed feelings

Since last post the market had a moderate dip, rebounded back to the highs and for the past 5 days has been dripping  lower. This is the time of the year when I look back and look ahead. It's been yet another  crazy year. If you told me that the SPX would finish up 17% in 2025 after the liberation day meltdown I would have said you must be smoking the really good stuff. Even the most bullish of  bulls must have been surprised by this. We came into 2025 with complacent conditions as I had pointed out at the time and it made me cautious.  But the liberation day meltdown created the sentiment reset that paved the way forward to allow for the market to recover and soar to new highs the way it did. We went from Trump euphoria to Trump deep pessimism by mid April 2025. Sentiment has now however shifted back towards complacency...not euphoria, but complacency. Let's examine why. 

Wallstreet's average SPX year end targets for 2023 and 2024 were for gains of 5% and 2% respectively. It would  be far better to have this type of low expectation than what we have now given the average 2026 year end target of about 7600 which implies a 11% gain from here. That's not what you would call  wall of worry conditions especially coming off the back of 3 consecutive years of strong returns. Optimism is mainly centered around  rate cuts, AI adaption, and earnings growth beyond the Mag 7. Coming into 2025 we saw similar optimism from strategists with rosy year end price targets centered on bullish implications of Trump's tax cuts and de-regulation. By April the optimism towards Trump turned to deep pessimism thanks to Trump's threat of punitive tariffs and year end price targes were aggressively slashed. The lower expectations provided the necessary rebuilding of the wall of worry for the bull market to resume. It would appear that we need to see a similar rebuilding of the wall of the worry at some point in 2026 which implies a significant correction would be required. In 2025 it required a 20% decline to rebuild the wall.  That doesn't necessarily mean another 20% drop is required again this time.... it would be quite rare to see 2 consecutive years of 20% drop..., but if we don't get much of a correction in the coming months and the market instead just simply keeps going higher we would then see the market go from complacency to euphoria setting us up for an even bigger decline. Aside from rosy price targets, here's other evidence showing we have a complacent/overheated market.

Despite the bearish implications of the above charts which warrant at least a 5-10% correction, we have not yet seen the euphoric conditions that mark a major bull market peak . One classic sign of that would be a flood of IPO activity centered on AI. It seems unlikely that the so called bubble in AI is going to imminently burst without major flood of IPO activity which has not occurred as of yet.  Open AI is slated to IPO in 2nd half of 2026 at the earliest and so I'm looking at that event as to when the AI peak would be immanent. Obviously, there's no guarantee of that. Here's some other charts which suggest the bull market, albeit overextended, still has legs.

Bottom line for me is that current market conditions are not favorable in the short to intermediate term. Sure, markets can keep marching higher from here and possibly enter a blow-off phase which would be lucrative to capture , but when there's no wall of worry to climb it becomes a question of when, not if, the market hits a major air pocket and gives back all the gains and then some. It would appear to me that the market is in need of a reset.  Despite my concerns, it would appear that longer term the market still has a ways to go before hitting a secular peak. Just look at that last chart I posted which is consumer confidence. It would be inconceivable to see a secular bull market peak with confidence near record lows, benign IPO activity., and more favorable monetary conditions forthcoming. Let's see how it goes...